Diagnosis & direction
Initial discovery, the architecture read, the critical tradeoffs, the roadmap, and the final recommendation — the parts that require senior judgment.
For organizations
Five starting points, one honest boundary: what Chris owns, what he stays involved in, and what stays with your team. If none of this is obvious yet, the strategy call sorts it out faster than reading this page.
Start here
Each row below maps a situation to the right entry point. You can always confirm the fit on a strategy call before committing to anything.
Pipelines fail, reports disagree, ownership is unclear, or the current platform is exposing the business to operational, security, or compliance risk. You need to know what's actually broken before deciding what to do about it. See it in action: the SOX audit-governance case study.
02The platform decision isn't settled, a migration is approaching, or the architecture needs a clear design before implementation starts. Deciding between Databricks and Fabric fits here.
03You already have a team and a platform. What's missing is a steady senior read on design reviews, tradeoffs, and escalations — not a one-time deliverable. See it in action: the pipeline-reliability case study.
04The estate is large or complex enough that a standard audit or blueprint isn't the right shape. Databricks Lakehouse Readiness and Synapse-to-Fabric Migration reviews live here. See it in action: the Fabric migration risk assessment case study.
05If the problem is still fuzzy, don't try to self-diagnose the engagement type first. A 30-minute conversation sorts that out faster than reading pricing pages.
Want the evidence first? Read the case studies →
Boundary clarity
It means the core judgment doesn’t disappear after the sale, and it doesn’t mean your team loses control of its own platform.
Initial discovery, the architecture read, the critical tradeoffs, the roadmap, and the final recommendation — the parts that require senior judgment.
Executive updates, design review, governance direction, and quality oversight within the agreed scope — not unlimited availability.
Internal teams keep operational ownership, execution, and day-to-day running of the platform. Nothing here transfers control away from your team.
What this is not
The output is diagnosis, risk visibility, and a prioritized remediation roadmap. Implementation is scoped separately, once you know what needs to happen.
The output is the target architecture and migration plan — not the delivery itself. A blueprint tells you what to build and in what order.
It's ongoing advisory and review — not operational ownership, not on-call support, and not a substitute for a delivery lead your team already needs.
They're focused, priced-to-complexity assessments for a specific platform transition — not a broad enterprise-wide review.
Still deciding?
The 30-Minute Strategy and Architecture Fit Call exists for exactly this — sorting out which engagement fits before either of us commits to one.
Book a strategy call ↗